Starter task

Run one feasibility end-to-end on a real deal (rough is fine).

Operator task

Tighten 3 assumptions and rerun — e.g.:

• Costs: add realistic holding/selling costs, bump the reno budget, check contingency

• End value: evidence-check against comparable sales / reduce the "hope factor"

• Time: add weeks, not days (approvals, trades, delays)

Best / Base / Worst (what that means)

Run the same deal three ways:

• Best: everything goes smoothly (still realistic)

• Base: what you genuinely expect

• Worst: budget blows out + timeline slips + end value softens

If the deal only works in Best, it's not a deal — it's a gamble.

Minimum standard (the 7 numbers)

• Purchase price

• Works budget

• Other costs (stamp/legals/holding/selling)

• Contingency %

• Total cost

• End value

• Profit / margin

(Optional but helpful: timeframe + your walk-away price)

Submit

Feaso screenshot (or filled template) + ONE question.

Good question examples

• "Is my end value defensible based on these comps?"

• "Which assumption is most likely wrong here — costs, time, or end value?"

• "Where should my walk-away line sit based on this?"

Copy/paste template

Deal/link:
Strategy:
Purchase:
Works:
Other costs:
Contingency %:
End value:
Profit/Margin:
Timeframe (optional):
MY ONE QUESTION: